Saturday, December 18, 2010

SISULU JUDICIALLY TARGETING PHIRI4EXPOSING MANDELA-EXTENDED-FAMILY-2001 HOOKER IN UNIFORM

"Siziwe" a.k.a "Sighs", the self-professed
Nelson Mandela Cousin
who achieved generalcy and other ranking
through adultery/prostitution
with at least one Raymond Lentsoe in Year 2000.
Goodman Manyanya Phiri, according to Mr Jacob Zuma,
must for 11 years now therefore continue to suffer
for blowing the whistle against this relative to a Mandela
that Zuma calls "The Father of The Nation South Africa".
Her official name is
Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo



PART 2-A
INTRODUCTION
Reader of my blog has from previous post seen for self how the Sisulu’s Kangaroo Courts have already been turned into tools for pro-British and pro-Mandela-Thembu-tribal sodomites, prostitutors, pornocrats and you-name-it (please see end of transcripts for contextual definitions of these terms) in order to corrupt our new democracy towards a vassal state pro-Britain.

The question that reader must ask the self is: what chance does Mr Goodman Manyanya Phiri have of a fair trial in that Sisulu setup, whereas Phiri’s mission since 2001 when he was charged was to blow the whistle on similar practice of powerful males prostituting female junior officers for senior officer-ship in the mandelocratic South Africa, particularly where Mandela/Matanzima’s Cousin Bobelo-Zini was concerned?


THE KANGAROO COURT RE-OPENABLE BY VIRTUE OF  MISGUIDED JUDGE SOUTHWOOD’S ORDER 10 November 2010 ORDER. (TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS DIGITIZED, DEMILITARIZED, ETC FOR READABILITY AND NATIONAL SECURITY)


1)      DEFENCE COUNSEL SIMELANE MNTUNGWA! MNGUNI WASEBUHLENI! NABONKHOSI! NABONGWANE! MPEMBELIKHULU LAKALOKOTFAKO! NDLEBEZIMCHEWANE ZACHEWULWA MAGUNDWANE! NDLEBEZIKHANYA LILANGA! NINEMATALANKHOS’ USOBHUZA! MAHLEMANGWERENGWERE EKHAYA NETSAFENI! NDLOVU ZIDLEKHAYA NGOKWESWELUMELUSI! BHOZONGO!:        Certain documents were required, Judge, because most of the charges did not all relate to his attendance of Junior Staff course at the Army's Junior Staff Course, and it was even in the newspapers that there were racial problems there, regarding those examinations.

2)      And my client then was party to those events that led to the appointment of the Inspector General of the South African Army, who then produced a certain report, the Inspector General’s Report, which is also relevant for the purpose of my client’s charges as to what was reported, the said Inspector’s investigations and what came out of that.

3)      And the examinations themselves and my client’s being summoned by the relevant people there conducting those examinations where some of the charges emanated from.

4)      And then it appeared to me that these documents, which my client requires, are in fact necessary because the charges are related, or are connected to those documents.

5)      And then I took over his request and made requests myself to the Chief of the Army, referring to the request Colonel Phiri had done previously. I also asked for my learned friend's assistance and it all came to nil by the end of 2001.

6)      And then when we came in February [2002] I then intimated to the court that now that the relevant authorities are not co-operating, we would then initiate a new procedure in terms of the Information Act, and consequently on 28 February [2002] we formally lodged with the Information Officer of the Department of Defence requesting all those documents which my client wanted. And on 5 March [2002] we got this letter, Judge, from Major Pretorius who is the relevant officer dealing with information.

7)      A relevant paragraph is Paragraph 6, the title is: "Request For Access To Records Of Body Lieutenant Colonel G.M. Phiri.

8)      Paragraph 6 reads:
a)      "Please note that the period for complying with and finalizing your request is 90 days as stipulated by the Act in Section 87(1)."

9)      I would like to place this letter as part of the record.

10)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Thank you.
11)   BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             Yes. So ...

12)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Please continue.
13)   BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             Judge, we then counted 90 days, which this document refers to, from 5 March [2002] when it was issued, then we determined that 5 June they would have finalized the request, and either way we would know that we are getting the document. If we were getting the documents then we can prepare for the trial.  If we don't, we possibly then look at appeal procedures together with ... (unclear) ... The basis of postponing today is to get a date after 5 June [2002] when the Information..Section of the Department of Defence would, in terms of the Act, have finalized Colonel Phiri's application for these documents.

14)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Okay.    And you say it's highly relevant for purposes of preparing your case, and for purposes of cross-examination regarding the report that this gentleman, the Inspector General, obviously was busy with and other aspects?

15)   BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             Yes, indeed, Judge, it is very relevant.
16)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Thank you. That is all from your side?
17)   BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             Yes.
18)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Thank  you, Counsel.      Madam Prosecutor, you heard what was said. I would like the state's input in this please.

19)   PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:          As the court pleases.      It is indeed so that during November [2001] we received a letter from Colonel Simelane requesting certain documents.  A letter was referred back to Colonel Simelane in November [2001], which he only received in December, where we indicated that this information is only available through the Information Act where the necessary authorities have to be contacted to get this necessary information. So, we did indeed inform the Colonel that in November/December already that this information will be needed to be ... or got hold of from through the Information Act through the necessary committee.

20)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:  Okay, but the time period of two months is not that serious, if you take two months further to request the information.
21)   If the state is also of the opinion that they cannot provide that information surely ... and that might be relevant for purposes of preparing this case and/or for purposes of cross-examination, it might be in the interest of justice just to postpone it for this 90-day period to see what information is forthcoming and whether this case can proceed, because at the end of the day one is sitting with an apparently relevant request, the way I understand it.

22)   PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF: That's correct, Judge.
23)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE: So is there any objection against this postponement from the state's side?

24)   PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:  Not at this stage.  No, Judge.  The postponement date, Judge, the prosecution as well as the defence counsel discussed, we are looking at 24 June [2002].

25)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            24 June [2002]?
26)   PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:          24 June 2002.
27)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            And that will be what date?
PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:          It's a Monday, Judge, 24.
HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Okay. Does that suit you, Counsel?
BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             Yes, Judge, it's a brief date.

28)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Okay.    This case will be postponed once again, Colonel [Phiri]. Do you understand what the significance of this postponement is? You have to be here, if you are not  here a warrant of arrest can be issued, so obviously, as a  senior officer [do] be responsible, [do] be here and at all relevant  times, [do] keep contact with your counsel because a counsel, per definition, has many clients and cannot be looking for you. You should be in a position, and have a duty to make continuous contact regarding this trial with your counsel.  [Do] you understand?

29)   ACCUSED GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI:  Yes, Judge.
HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:  Okay.               When do you have to be back...on what date?
ACCUSED GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI:  24 June 2002, Judge.
HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:  Okay. Are there any other concerns from your side, [Colonel Phiri], before I postpone this matter?
ACCUSED GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI:  Not at the moment, Judge.
HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:  Okay. Thank you.

30)   HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE: Counsel [Simelane], anything else you want to place on record?
BHEKUMNDENI Q. PENUEL SIMELANE, SENIOR MILITARY DEFENCE COUNSEL:             No, nothing further, Judge.
HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:            Thank you. Then this case is postponed.
PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:          Thank you, Judge, if it pleases the court.

31)   (Case is postponed until 24 June 2002)
32)   (End of tape 1)


********************************
                                             CONTEXTUAL DEFINITIONS:


PORNOCRAT      1.“A WOMAN COMMANDING OFFICER WHO GAINED RANK THROUGH SEXUAL OR SIMILARLY-EMOTIONAL LIAISON WITH SENIOR(S) RATHER THAN THROUGH PLAIN MERIT”

2.  "A believer that such practice is too common in South Africa and should therefore be viewed as an accepted norm never to be linked to corruption."


PROSTITUTOR: 1.“A MALE SENIOR OFFICER WHO HAS CAUSED AT LEAST ONE WOMAN OFFICER TO BE PROMOTED THROUGH HIS FAVOURS VIA SEX OR SIMILAR EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HIM”

2. "A believer that such practice is too common in South Africa and should therefore be viewed as an accepted norm never to be linked to corruption."



PREAMBLE


BONE OF CONTENTION: EXPLOITS OF MANDELA-MATANZIMA-COUSIN 2001-COLLEGE-PROSTITUTE BRIGADIER GENERAL BOBELO-ZINI AND PHIRI’S BLOWING OF THE WHISTLE 06 FEBRUARY 2001 AGAINST PROSTITUTION IN THE ARMY OF THEN PRESIDENT THABO MVUYELWA MBEKI)


ARCH-CONSTRUCTOR OF CHARGES: ATTEMPTED “PROSTITUTOR” ARMY INSPECTOR GENERAL EX-EASTERN CAPE ENOCK MUISENG MASHOALA, MAJOR GENERAL, AND HE WHO “WAS DEMANDING SEX AND ON SOUR GRAPES ENDED UP VICTIMISING STAFF SERGEANT MABEL MBATHA” ON OUR PREVIOUS POST.  MASHOALA’S OFFICE NOT ONLY REJECTED PHIRI’S 06-FEBRUARY-2001 REPORT TO HIS OFFICE ABOUT AMONG OTHER THINGS SEX-FOR-PROMOTION BETWEEN 2001 PROSTITUTOR RAYMOND LENTSOE COLONEL AND 2001-PROSTITUTE BOBELO-ZINI, BUT MASHOALA’S OFFICE ALSO LIAISED WITH ANTI-PHIRI STATE WITNESS
EDDIE DROST TO GIVE THE LATTER A GO-AHEAD WITH THE ANTI-PHIRI TRUMPED-UP CHARGES OF 09 MARCH 2001, THAT LINDIWE SISULU IS FORCING PHIRI TO ANSWER TO IN 2011 DESPITE SISULU’S FULL KNOWLEDGE ON HOW THABO MBEKI WAS ABUSING COURTS (EXAMPLE PRESIDENT ZUMA’S UNFAIR LEGAL TROUBLES IN THE PAST) TO FOSTER AND PROMOTE TRIBALISM AND REGIONALISM IN FAVOUR OF THE EASTERN CAPE WHERE LINDIWE SISULU’S FATHER AND FRIEND

NELSON MANDELA WERE BORN....[(to the reader of this post, Blogger's elucidation on the Mashoala character, please check the yellow highlight to be found here)]....



THE PROSECUTOR: A SMOKE-FILLED-ROOM CHARACTER Ms KAREN BOSHOFF WHO IS NOT ONLY UNDER THE COMMAND OF BOTH “PROSTITUTOR” DUNSTAN SMART REAR ADMIRAL OR HIS BLUE-EYED BOY SEGOMOTSO BAILEY MMONO MAJOR GENERAL, BUT HAS GONE A MILE EXTRA TO REMOVE FROM THE OFFICE OF ARCH-CONSTRUCTOR OF CHARGES MASHOALA  THE ONE OTHER DOCUMENT CONFIRMING THE PROSTITUTION IN 2001 BETWEEN MANDELA/MATANZIMA COUSIN BOBELO-ZINI- AND LENTSOE, A DOCUMENT AND SIMILAR ONES JOINTLY WRITTEN BY STUDENTS COMPLAINING ABOUT THE LIFE ABOVE THE LAW LED BY MILITARY OFFICERS BORN IN NELSON MANDELA’S EASTERN CAPE  PROVINCE OR RELATED to HIM, WAS AS PER A SWORN AFFIDAVIT FROM MASHOALA'S OFFICE [TAKEN AND CAUSED TO DISAPPEAR BY NO ONE ELSE EXCEPT PROSECUTOR Ms KAREN BOSHOFF].




THE JUDGE: A PORNOCRAT OR SOMEONE UNDER THE COMMAND OF BOTH “PORNOCRAT” ANNEMARIE MYBURGH {BRIGADIER GENERAL} AND “PROSTITUTOR” DUNSTAN SMART REAR ADMIRAL OR HIS BLUE-EYED BOY SEGOMOTSO BAILEY MMONO {MAJOR GENERAL})



ANTI-PHIRI STATE WITNESSES: PROSTITUTORS, THE COLLEGE INSTRUCTOR OR TWO WHO, LIKE RAYMOND LENTSOE, WERE HAVING ILLICIT AND CORRUPT SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH WOMEN LIKE MANDELA-MATANZIMA COUSIN BOBELO-ZINI 2001 IN ORDER TO CORRUPTLY PROMOTE THEIR COLLEGE STATUS OR RANK.  STATE-WITNESS JOHAN HENDRIK BEYERS KLEYNHANS HIMSELF WAS “HAVING A 2001 EXTRA-MARITAL AFFAIR ON COLLEGE WITH LIEUTENANT COLONEL RENTIA DEINER” WHICH ROBBED HIM OF THE MORAL HIGH-GROUND TO CHARGE RAYMOND LENTSOE FOR A CORRUPTING SEX ENGAGEMENT WITH MANDELA/MATANZIMA COUSIN, BOBELO-ZINI).



ACCUSED: WHISTLEBLOWER ON SISULU’S SEX-FOR-PROMOTIONED SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCEGOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI, LIEUTENANT COLONEL.


LINDIWE NONCEBA SISULU’S OWN LITTLE DIRTY TRICKS AND ILLEGAL TACTICS: THE UNLAWFUL REFUSAL TO PAY TO THIS DAY +-R300 000 DUE TO PHIRI’S HIGH COURT LAWYERS AND THEREBY UNLAWFULLY PREVENTING PHIRI FROM LAUNCHING AN APPEAL AGAINST PRO-SISULU’S JUDGE-SOUTHWOOD-MISGUIDED-IF-NOT-NIEU-COLONIALIST-JUDGEMENT AT THE EXPENSE OF INNOCENT PHIRI.



THREE CONCLUSIONS


Conclusion One: Seeing that the entire legal system of ethnic-Eastern-Cape-Lindiwe Sisulu is tainted with the corruption of sex-for-promotion whereas PHIRI blew the whistle on the sex-for-promotion by Mandela/Matanzima Cousin Bobelo-Zini Brigadier GeneralPHIRI can never have a fair trial in biased Sisulu’s Military Courts.


 Conclusion Two: Seeing that the initial bone of contention back in 2001 was an Eastern-Cape-born woman officer who was selling her body for promotion, yet all three or more judges that have sat in Sisulu’s military courts so far have been lily-white ethnic Europeans, all three or more prosecutors in the case have similarly been lily-white ethnic Europeans, and all state witnesses have been predominantly lily-white ethnic Europeans with none of them from the Eastern Cape of Nelson Mandelathe assumption that people from the Eastern Cape are more intelligent that other black people of the Republic of South Africa or the rest of the Continent and thereby “deserve the right to occupy all the strategic positions in South Africa particularly Mandela in the military” is a British nieu-Colonial myth.  These tribal characters on ivory towers pro-Mandela-tribe are just stooges of a nieu-colonialist rule over South Africa; AND, AS ALL OTHER STOOGES ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, THEY ARE TOTALLY INCAPABLE OF FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE, OR ANY OTHER BATTLE FOR THAT MATTER, DEMANDING OF BRAINS AS IS THE BATTLE AGAINST PHIRI, HENCE THE WHITE MASTERS OF POST-1994 SOUTH AFRICA'S "FREEDOM" COME OUT IN THEIR GREAT NUMBERS AND THEIR TRUE COLOURS TO DEFEND THEIR BLACK EASTERN-CAPE STOOGES AND HOUSE-SLAVES CLUTCHING ON THE FORMER'S COATTAILS!


Conclusion ThreeSince the loading of the dice by means of filling a court process with one racial group, particularly members of the tiny-minority white group who formerly colonized and oppressed black people in South Africa is against all policies of both the government of the Republic of South Africa and the ruling party (the great African National Congress of Pixley Seme), if Mr Zuma allows Ms Lindiwe Nonceba Sisulu, like a tail wagging the dog, to continue with the military kangaroo court against Phiri as directed by Sisulu’s fellow-tribesman-at-High-Court B.R. Southwood the Briton, such allowance will mark the beginning of a painful end to the rule of Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma... a Grand Adios EVEN BEFORE THE ANC’S CENTENARY IN 2012!


1)       (THE TRIAL IS A PLOY FOR VICTIMIZATION AFTER PHIRI BLEW THE WHISTLE ON MATANZIMA/MANDELA-COUSIN-BOBELO-ZINI’S SEX FOR PROMOTION BACK IN 2001 WHICH SISULU’S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS FEARS WILL OPEN A CAN OF WORMS ON OTHER FEMALES LIKE DIRECTOR OF SANDF JUDGES ETHNIC AFRICAN MRS ANNEMARIE MYBURGH WHO REPORTEDLY GOT HER PROMOTION THROUGH EMOTIONAL INVOLVEMENT WITH HER SUPERVISOR ETHNIC-BRITISH OFFICER DUNSTAN SMART)
2)       Nature of the transcripts
3)       These transcripts are only a reflection of those portions that Ms Karen Boshoff, the prosecutor with an axe to grind against Phiri turned review officer, made accessible to me.  The records definitely do not include areas where the various senior military judges made controversial, unseemly and prejudicial statements against Phiri.
4)       PROSECUTION COUNSEL Ms KAREN BOSHOFF:       As the court pleases, Judge, the DD1 was written out 9 March 2001 where the member was formally charged, Section 29 Appearance on the Directing Staff l 9 March 2001 where a recording officer was appointed. Preliminary investigation was finalised 16 March 2001, then the first postponement was on 28 June 2001, postponed to 18 September 20 2001. The third Section 29 the matter was postponed again on 18 September 2001 to 26 November 2001. The fourth Section 29 was 26 November until where the matter was once again postponed to 8 January 2001 (2002?), and from that period of second 29 Appearance 28 June 2001 the matter was postponed on request from the defence counsel. From 8 January 2002 the matter was postponed to 26 February 2002, then on 26 February 2002, once again the matter was postponed to 24 April 2002.  The seventh Section 29 Appearance appeared on 26 April_ 2002. where the-matter was postponed to 24 June 2002. The last postponement was on 24 June 2002 till date 10 September 2002 for final remand and for proceeding on the matter. All these postponements were due to the defence counsel's request for postponement and the state, through all these postponements, was ready to proceed. HENDRIK JOHANNES LÜÜS, SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE:       Thank you, Madam
5)       Secondly, the veracity or precision of case law quoted here cannot be relied upon for several reasons chief of which is the fact that what you read is the result of scanned material and too many characters of print will as a rule fall through the cracks of the scanner.  The same reasoning goes for corrected spelling the luxury of which I will leave for others to consummate (the “others” including those of my most enterprising of readership who, I gather, can with ease correct spelling for their own brain as they go along!
6)       Lastly, I have further simplified the reading (or “complicated” it) by identifying the personal names of the lawyers in the military court.  It is important in a country still besieged with tribalism (the highest form of racism) in its military for the reader to know who the individuals are who, hiding behind the cloak of military-law officers, but still perpetuate racism or tribalism in a (people-driven) democracy of South Africa.
7)       Senior Military Judges: There has been talk of a Senior Military Judge Sisulu or some similar Thembu surname in the military.  His impact in transforming the SANDF, it would seem, has gone unseen.  This is to say nothing about transforming the very military judicial system which is practically lily-white when it comes to judges and prosecutors in an army where mostly blacks are charged quite disproportionately from their demographic signature, for allegedly committing crimes against a disproportionately overrepresented senior whites and Thembus in the Mandela-Mbeki SANDF.  Worst, it would seem that the sex-for-promotion corruption is rife even in the very military judicial system. The serious question is whether the female supervisor of senior military judges in the SANDF, one Brigadier General Annemarie Myburgh and an apparently married woman, for that matter, had not got his promotion through emotional involvement with at least kisses in the headquarters of the SANDF with military legal supremo, Rear Admiral Charles Dunstan Henry Smart.  While Smart is the man who has gone on record as having gone to his own court to coerce a judge to allow a rumoured girlfriend of General Sphiwe Nyanda walk scot-free after a conviction that was bound to have her dismissed from the SANDF (fraud), his kissy-kissy woman friend Myburgh has always made it a point to appear in court whenever the Phiri sitting takes place and she has been known to be coaching her judges in situ, particular Judge Michael Albertus Venter who, as you will see in the transcripts, is the one who tried to force a trial against Phiri whereas Phiri had not received even one document required by law as a prerequisite for defence.  Myburgh is of course concerned for a sure conviction against Phiri, I believe, because should Phiri be found not guilty, the government will naturally have to pursue the sex-for-promotion Mandela-cousin Brigadier General Bobelo-Zini enjoyed and probable similar promotion trajectory for Myburgh.  What chances is there that Phiri will receive a fair trial without one single non-Thembu and non-white judge who will also have courage enough to stand against another Myburgh breathing down his/her neck?

ZERO!!!
8)       Prosecution Counsel Prosecution counsels have followed a similarly racially-biased pattern in my experience, lily white prosecuting a virtual all-black accused of challenging the authority of some white or Thembu-related general or Colonel.  My experience with this particular type of lawyers is they are tricksters out go get you without one ounce of ethics in terms of required procedures.  Prosecutor Boshoff in these pages has been placed on record as having by around 9 March 2001 received a copy of the Mashoala report (or portions thereof) I am looking for through the High Court, but she never to this day handed it to me to this day.
9)       Senior Military Defence Counsel
10)     Insofar as the players are in these transcripts, the Accused naturally is Goodman Manyanya Phiri; his Defence counsel has always been Bheki Simelane, a 65-year-old Veteran of South Africa’s anti-liberation struggle behind his belt also with extensive law practice in Durban where he nearly lost his life in the hands of the apartheid security forces for his never-say-die spirit of defending freedom fighters who were arrested.  In exile, Simelane also practised as an advocate in the Robert Mugabe government.  On his return to South Africa during repatriation, he joined the SANDF as one of the most senior and longest-serving former guerrillas; and in that regard, definitely more senior than Sphiwe Nyanda who under the Mandela government, was perhaps controversially appointed Chief SANDF whereas a more senior man was available.
11)     My reading is that Nyanda was preferred over Simelane mainly because Mandela wanted to cut himself as this saint who did not harbour any of the anti-Zulu tribalism of exile by appointing a Zulu as head of the military.  But when you discover that Simelane is also a Zulu, then you realize that perhaps the overriding reason for Mandela was to try and placate the Zulu- and Swazi-speaking families who, alongside Seme, the Royal Dlamini (through writer’s maternal great-aunt Swazi Queen Mother Labotsibeni) and later Masina and the mostly-forgotten-and-maligned Hadebe family whose head reportedly opened the first exile office of the ANC in exile only to be maligned by subsequent Thembu tribalists in exile for his troubles.  Now Sphiwe Nyanda is a member of the Lesley Masina extended family. As to whether he is related to good governance is a question that speaks for itself what with ethnic-British-spawned white racism is still rife in the SANDF that he until around two years ago he had been running for something like a whole decade.  It is also under Nyanda’s watch that Mandela and subsequently Mbeki used the SANDF as a spoil or a milking cow for the  Mandela extended-family members and fellow-tribespeople to be in the most senior SANDF positions with the likes of the Matanzimas and now the Bobelo-Zini central to this State-versus-Phiri case.  It is furthermore under Nyanda’s watch that the usage became rife of sex with the highly-placed of the SANDF where Mandela relatives/tribespeople and their ethnic British fellow-senior commanders dominate, as a deciding tool for promotion of women officers to more senior positions in the military as is the case with Bobelo-Zini. As an eye-opener, Sphiwe Nyanda is also one of the cabinet ministers fired by Jacob Zuma recently for lack of performance!
12)     [Court sitting 26 April 2001]
13)     this sitting is a mere time estimation based on the evidence to follow hereunder.  The review section of Sisulu Military Records claims they do not have records of what took place in the matter of State Versus Phiri prior to that. Definitely, Ms Karen Boshoff, Prosecutor-turned-reviews officer, handed no transcript earlier than what lies hereunder.  Raising questions on any successful and fair review of the case supposing Phiri is found guilty by Sisulu’s kangaroo court at her military, the absence of huge chunks of recorded matter (I call it a sabotage by Sisulu’s criminals in uniform playing lawyers), the dearth and actually disappearance of court records and recordings ( confirmed even by Military Judge Michael Albertus Venter   the court sitting of 13:40 on 25 February 2004.) raises the moot question as to whether injustice in the case of Phiri has already been ingrained by Sisulu in order to teach a lesson to any South African who dares challenge criminals elements of the two big families (Sisulu and Mandela) that nieu-colonialist Britain is using to perpetrate the untold mineral, cultural and other forms of exploitation against this African country.












No comments:

Followers